Websites

Your work outgrew your website.

I plan, write, design, and build websites for established companies. One person carries it from the first question to launch, then hands over the production accounts and assets.

The gap

The one place your business still looks average

Your best work already makes the case in person. The website flattens it, burying the proof, blurring the difference, and making a referral work harder than it should. Everything else in the business moved forward. The site is the exception, and it is often the first thing a serious buyer sees.

Engagements

Priced by scope, written before work

Every engagement begins with the result, exclusions, price, decision gates, and acceptance in writing. No hourly meter and no moving target.

Direction

$2,000–3,000

Positioning, site architecture, verbal direction, and one tangible creative route before a larger build.

Focused Website

$5,000–8,000

A small site done completely rather than a large site done thinly.

Signature Website

$8,000–15,000

The core engagement: positioning, finished copy, custom design, build, QA, launch, and handoff.

Authority Website

$15,000–25,000

For companies with multiple audiences, deeper evidence, or a real content system.

Digital Flagship

$25,000–50,000+

When the website is a consequential company asset and the work needs original media direction, richer interaction, or specialist depth.

Portals, commerce, databases, accounts, and application behavior begin with paid discovery ($3,000–5,000) and separate scope.

Written before built

The boundary is part of the work.

A redacted real-project scope shows the result, exclusions, price, decisions, and acceptance before production begins.

Redacted project scope showing result, included work, exclusions, price, and acceptance
Redacted scope artifact

What you can inspect now

Open the work and judge it directly.

Two client sites are live and linked on the Work page, along with two studio concept builds that show range in categories I have not shipped for a client yet.

What if one person is too small for the project?

Then this is not the right fit. The solo model works when one senior lead can hold the whole website and add named specialists where the scope requires them. Production accounts, code, files, and the decision record stay under your control, so continuity does not depend on me.

Why not use a $2,000 template?

Use one when the business needs a competent online presence and the difference between companies is not doing much commercial work. This studio is for the opposite situation: the difference matters, the purchase carries weight, and a generic answer hides what the buyer needs to see.

Is AI doing the work?

I use modern tools backstage to increase range, speed, and scrutiny. You are buying original judgment, responsible implementation, and a finished asset, not access to a model or a promise that tools remove oversight.

Will the site guarantee leads, rankings, or revenue?

No. A website cannot honestly guarantee a business outcome by itself. It can make the company easier to understand, put the right proof where doubt appears, build a clear next step, and implement agreed measurement. Outcomes are evidence to earn after launch.

Where are the case studies?

Two client sites are live and linked. Neither carries a results claim yet, because I have not measured one I could stand behind. When I have, it will be on the Work page with the client's permission.

Your work already set the standard

The website should meet it.

Start a project

A direct reply from the person who would build it, not an automated sales sequence.